Truth be told, to my fellow Amateur Radio Operators, Amateur Packet Radio was my first love. It combined three of my technological passions - radio communications, computers, and data communications. When I moved to the Seattle area in 1987, I fell in with a bad crowd which over the decades has become known as the "WETNET Mafia". That group built a number of Amateur Radio data repeaters (full regeneration) operating at 9600 bps, and operated TCP/IP (concurrent with the opening of the Internet to "civilians"). I wrote about that network in an article
The Puget Sound Amateur Radio TCP/IP Network (Circa 1995). I've sporadically written about Amateur Radio data communications over the years, including periods of writing for (and very briefly, editing) the TAPR Packet Status Register (PSR) newsletter, and a column in CQ Amateur Radio magazine.
As of 2020, I'm semi-retired and living in Bellingham, Washington and devoting much of my time to exploring Amateur Radio Data Communications.
I'm the Editor of Zero Retries Newsletter which discusses technological innovation in Amateur Radio.
Blast from the Past - Linux Routers and Amateur Radio Spread Spectrum
In doing some research for another article here on SuperPacket, I ran across a prescient statement I made to Linux Gazette (later, Linux Journal?) that routers and gateways used in Amateur radio would be based on Linux. My statement must have made an impression because Linux Gazette posted it on their website.
Subject: TAPR SS Position Statement
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 12:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steve Stroh
To: Phil Hughes WB6SWR
I suspect that the "Intranet" described below will be built on Linux-based IP routers, possibly a simple implementation that can be booted from floppy or Flash Card.
It's going to be very, very interesting.
Steve N8GNJ, <old email address redacted>
Amateur Radio TCP/IP <old email address redacted>
| Amateur Spread Spectrum is the wave of the present!
...
Fast forward sixteen years... When the Raspberry Pi computers came along in 2012, I knew that they were going to be very popular in Amateur Radio. Finally we had a powerful (enough) inexpensive embeddable computer that ran a powerful operating system that could be "headless" and scriptable and stable. Before then we had embeddable computers that were expensive, Linux was fussy and non-standard on embedded devices, and most Amateur Radio software was running on Windows.
Below is the meat of that email to Linux Gazette.
...
TAPR's Statement on Spread Spectrum Technology Development
http://www.tapr.org/
TAPR was founded in 1982 as a membership supported non-profit amateur radio research and development organization with specific interests in the areas of packet and digital communications. In the tradition of TAPR, the Board of Directors at their Fall 1995 meeting voted that the organization would begin to actively pursue the research and development of amateur radio spread spectrum digital communications. At the Spring 1996 board of directors meeting, the following statement of purpose was passed:
"TAPR believes that the technical facts support our conviction that conventional and spread spectrum systems can coexist without detriment to conventional systems on all frequencies from MF to EHF. To this end, TAPR will begin to research spread spectrum systems that will develop technology for future deployment."
As stated above, the TAPR board feels strongly about TAPR's focus on spread spectrum technology and especially how it relates to the potential coexistence on frequencies that will have increased number of users occupying them. The amateur radio bands, like other spectrum will become more heavily utilized in the future. It is in the interest of amateur radio to develop systems that are interference-resistant while not interfering with other primary or secondary users on those frequencies.
TAPR understands the concerns many have with the new technology, and believes that efforts in both education and research is necessary in order to allay the fears about interference and to demonstrate the benefits of the technology.
TAPR believes that todays' communications technology is moving toward all digital transmitters and receivers. These advances in technology, combined with the swift evolution of cell based transmission and switching protocols, are opening up a new set of possibilities for unique new services utilizing intelligent networks. These will contain smart transmitters, receivers, and switches. Today's Internet is perhaps the best example of a self-regulating structure that embodies these new technological approaches to communications in the networking domain. However, to date, many of these innovations have not moved into the wireless networking arena. TAPR will work on moving these innovations into the amateur radio community.
TAPR feels that the VHF/UHF/SHF radio networks of the future will involve a mixture of links and switches of different ownership, which terminate at the end-user via relatively short-distance links. What will then be required is a built-in, distributed, self-governing set of protocols to cause the network's behavior to make more efficient use of a limited, common shared resource, the radio spectrum. Creating such a self-regulating structure for the optimal sharing of spectrum will require much effort.
One of the major problems which stands in the way of these new approaches today is the current FCC regulatory environment and the manner in which spectrum is managed and allocated under its rules.
Historically, the current regulatory approach to radio has been based upon the technology that was in use at the time that the Communications Act of 1934 was framed, basically what we would call today, 'dumb' transmitters speaking to 'dumb' receivers. The technology of that time required reserved bandwidths to be set aside for each licensed service so that spectrum would be available when needed. Given this regulatory approach, many new applications cannot be accommodated since there is no available unallocated spectrum to 'park' new services. However, given the new set of tools available to the entrepreneur with the advent of digital technology, what once were 'dumb' transmitters and receivers can now be smart devices which are capable of exercising greater judgment in the effective use and sharing of spectrum. The more flexible the tools that we incorporate in these devices, the greater the number of uses that can be accommodated in a fixed, shared spectrum.
Therefore, TAPR will focus its spread spectrum effort in the following areas:
TAPR will work to promote rules and technologies to make the most efficient use of the spectrum through power control, forward error correction, and other means to minimize interference among spread spectrum users and existing communications systems.
TAPR will work on issues and efforts with other national organizations to change the regulatory environment and rules in order to promote the experimentation, development, and later deployment of spread spectrum technology.
TAPR will work to develop information on the topic to help educate members and the amateur community as a whole about spread spectrum technology, and to disseminate this information via printed publications, the World Wide Web, presentations at conferences and meetings, and other means.
TAPR will work to foster experimentation, development, and design of spread spectrum systems, and to facilitate the exchange of information between the researchers and other interested parties.
TAPR will work to develop a national intra-network to foster the deployment of future high-speed spread spectrum systems into regional and local communities, including the development of suitable protocols and guidelines for deployment of these systems.
TAPR will work with commercial companies who manufacture spread spectrum devices which operate in spectrum shared by the amateur radio service (ARS), in order to make them more aware of the nature of ARS operations on those bands with the goal to work towards the deployment of devices which will minimize interference between all spectrum sharing partners.
TAPR will work with commercial companies who manufacture spread spectrum devices in order to identify equipments that can be either used or modified for use for Part 97 operation.
Adopted by the TAPR Board on September 20th, 1996 at Seatac, Washington Board Meeting.
Spread Spectrum Statement Committee:
Greg Jones, WD5IVD
Dewayne Hendricks, WA8DZP
Barry McLarnon, VE3JF
Steve Bible, N7HPR
...
TAPR joined an existing Special Temporary Authority (STA) investigation to operate Spread Spectrum in Amateur Radio spectrum. If memory serves there was a second STA established solely by TAPR. Both STAs concluded with a report to the FCC that Spread Spectrum operations were usable in Amateur Radio spectrum. Years later, the FCC finally made some rule changes regarding Spread Spectrum in Amateur Radio spectrum. The FCC's new rules were overly cautious regarding Spread Spectrum operations by Amateur Radio operators with onerous restrictions on power levels that the American Radio Relay League insisted on to protect legacy modes. In 2021 Spread Spectrum operation in Amateur Radio is "common", but only in the bands that Amateur Radio shares with / adjacent to Part 15.247 devices, namely in the 902-928 MHz, 2.4 GHz, and 5 GHz bands.
I participated in one or both of the STAs. In my report to the FCC, I concluded that Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS), even at high power levels, was completely compatible with Amateur Radio operations in Amateur Radio VHF and UHF bands, due to the minimal "dwell time" on any one portion of an Amateur Radio band. In 2021... due to the very minimal use of repeaters for voice communications, my conviction of the usability of FHSS in Amateur Radio is even stronger.
Amateur Radio dreamed bigger back then. I hope that with some new capabilities, Amateur Radio can dream big again.
Thanks for reading!
Steve Stroh N8GNJ
Bellingham, Washington, USA
2021-05-07
Posted by Steve Stroh on May 07, 2021 at 11:26 AM in Amateur Radio Future, AREDN, General Commentary, Microwave, Regulatory | Permalink